# State Management Standards for TypeScript
This document outlines the standards for managing application state in TypeScript projects. It emphasizes modern approaches, best practices, and patterns to ensure maintainable, performant, and scalable applications.
## 1. General Principles
### 1.1. Immutability
* **Do This:** Prefer immutable data structures whenever possible.
* **Don't Do This:** Mutate state directly.
**Why:** Immutability simplifies reasoning about state changes, prevents unexpected side effects, and enhances debugging. It also enables techniques like time-travel debugging and optimized rendering in UI frameworks.
**Code Example:**
"""typescript
// Immutable update using the spread operator
interface User {
id: number;
name: string;
age: number;
}
let user: User = { id: 1, name: "Alice", age: 30 };
// Good: Create a new object with the updated age
let updatedUser: User = { ...user, age: 31 };
// Bad: Mutating the original object directly
// user.age = 31; // Avoid this
"""
### 1.2. Predictable State Transitions
* **Do This:** Use explicit actions or events to trigger state changes.
* **Don't Do This:** Rely on implicit or hidden state mutations.
**Why:** Predictable state transitions make it easier to understand how the application's state evolves over time, leading to increased maintainability and debuggability.
**Code Example (using a Redux-like pattern):**
"""typescript
// Define action types
type Action =
| { type: "INCREMENT" }
| { type: "DECREMENT" };
// Define the reducer function
type CounterState = { count: number };
const initialState: CounterState = { count: 0 };
function counterReducer(state: CounterState = initialState, action: Action): CounterState {
switch (action.type) {
case "INCREMENT":
return { ...state, count: state.count + 1 };
case "DECREMENT":
return { ...state, count: state.count - 1 };
default:
return state;
}
}
// Example usage (simplified)
let currentState = initialState;
currentState = counterReducer(currentState, { type: "INCREMENT" });
console.log(currentState); // Output: { count: 1 }
"""
### 1.3. Single Source of Truth
* **Do This:** Centralize application state into a single store or context.
* **Don't Do This:** Scatter state across multiple components or services without a clear hierarchy.
**Why:** A single source of truth ensures consistency and avoids data duplication. It makes it easier to manage complex state interactions and provides a clear picture of the application's overall state.
### 1.4. Separation of Concerns
* **Do This:** Separate state management logic from UI components and business logic.
* **Don't Do This:** Mix state updates directly within UI event handlers or business logic functions.
**Why:** Separation of concerns enhances testability, reusability, and maintainability. It allows you to modify state management mechanisms without affecting the rest of the application.
## 2. State Management Libraries and Patterns
### 2.1. Context API with "useReducer" (for simple to moderately complex state)
* **Do This:** Use the "useReducer" hook in conjunction with the Context API for managing localized, moderately complex state in React components.
* **Don't Do This:** Overuse the Context API for global state management in large applications, as it can lead to performance issues due to unnecessary re-renders.
**Why:** Well-suited for managing state that is localized to a specific part of the application. "useReducer" provides a structured way to update state, similar to Redux, but without the overhead of a global store. The Context API provides a means to distribute and consume state across React components.
**Code Example:**
"""typescript
import React, { createContext, useContext, useReducer } from 'react';
// Define the state type and action types
interface AuthState {
isAuthenticated: boolean;
user: { id: number; username: string } | null;
}
type AuthAction =
| { type: 'LOGIN'; payload: { id: number; username: string } }
| { type: 'LOGOUT' };
// Define the reducer function
const authReducer = (state: AuthState, action: AuthAction): AuthState => {
switch (action.type) {
case 'LOGIN':
return { ...state, isAuthenticated: true, user: action.payload };
case 'LOGOUT':
return { ...state, isAuthenticated: false, user: null };
default:
return state;
}
};
// Create the context
interface AuthContextType {
state: AuthState;
dispatch: React.Dispatch;
}
const AuthContext = createContext(undefined);
// Create the provider component
interface AuthProviderProps {
children: React.ReactNode;
}
const AuthProvider: React.FC = ({ children }) => {
const [state, dispatch] = useReducer(authReducer, { isAuthenticated: false, user: null });
return (
{children}
);
};
// Create a custom hook to consume the context
const useAuth = () => {
const context = useContext(AuthContext);
if (!context) {
throw new Error('useAuth must be used within an AuthProvider');
}
return context;
};
export { AuthProvider, useAuth };
// Usage in a component
const LoginComponent: React.FC = () => {
const { dispatch } = useAuth();
const handleLogin = () => {
// Simulate login
dispatch({ type: 'LOGIN', payload: { id: 1, username: 'testuser' } });
};
return (
Login
);
};
"""
### 2.2. Redux (for complex, application-wide state management)
* **Do This:** Use Redux for managing global application state, especially in large, complex applications. Combine with Redux Toolkit to simplify configuration and reduce boilerplate.
* **Don't Do This:** Use Redux for simple, component-local state. Opt for "useState" or "useReducer" in those cases. Avoid overly complex or deeply nested state structures that can hurt performance.
**Why:** Redux provides a centralized store, predictable state transitions, and a rich ecosystem of middleware and tools. Redux Toolkit provides conventions and utilities which make Redux easier to use.
**Code Example (using Redux Toolkit):**
"""typescript
import { configureStore, createSlice, PayloadAction } from '@reduxjs/toolkit';
import { TypedUseSelectorHook, useDispatch, useSelector } from 'react-redux';
// Define the state type
interface CounterState {
value: number;
}
// Define the initial state
const initialState: CounterState = {
value: 0,
};
// Create a slice
const counterSlice = createSlice({
name: 'counter',
initialState,
reducers: {
increment: (state) => {
state.value += 1;
},
decrement: (state) => {
state.value -= 1;
},
incrementByAmount: (state, action: PayloadAction) => {
state.value += action.payload;
},
},
});
// Export actions and reducer
export const { increment, decrement, incrementByAmount } = counterSlice.actions;
export const counterReducer = counterSlice.reducer;
// Configure the store
const store = configureStore({
reducer: {
counter: counterReducer,
},
});
export default store;
// Define RootState type
export type RootState = ReturnType;
export type AppDispatch = typeof store.dispatch;
// Custom hooks for useSelector and useDispatch with proper typing
export const useAppDispatch: () => AppDispatch = useDispatch;
export const useAppSelector: TypedUseSelectorHook = useSelector;
// Usage in a component
import { useAppDispatch, useAppSelector } from './store';
const Counter: React.FC = () => {
const count = useAppSelector((state) => state.counter.value);
const dispatch = useAppDispatch();
return (
<p>Count: {count}</p>
dispatch(increment())}>Increment
dispatch(decrement())}>Decrement
dispatch(incrementByAmount(5))}>Increment by 5
);
};
export default Counter;
"""
### 2.3. Zustand (for manageable complexity and performance)
* **Do This:** Consider Zustand as a simple, unopinionated state management solution. Suitable for applications where Redux might be overkill but "useReducer" is insufficient. Leverage selectors to optimize component re-renders.
* **Don't Do This:** Use Zustand for highly complex global state scenarios requiring advanced features (e.g., time travel debugging, middleware). Over-rely on global state when component-local state is more appropriate.
**Why:** Zustand is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It combines the benefits of mutable state with controlled updates, leading to good performance. It's an excellent middle-ground option. Selectors ensure components can subscribe to specific parts of the store, reducing unnecessary re-renders.
**Code Example:**
"""typescript
import { create } from 'zustand';
interface BearState {
bears: number;
increasePopulation: () => void;
removeAllBears: () => void;
}
const useBearStore = create((set) => ({
bears: 0,
increasePopulation: () => set((state) => ({ bears: state.bears + 1 })),
removeAllBears: () => set({ bears: 0 }),
}));
// Example consumer
import useBearStore from './store';
const BearCounter = () => {
const bears = useBearStore((state) => state.bears); // Select only what is needed
return {bears} around here ...;
};
const Controls = () => {
const increasePopulation = useBearStore((state) => state.increasePopulation);
const removeAllBears = useBearStore((state) => state.removeAllBears);
return (
<>
one up
remove all
)
}
"""
### 2.4. Jotai (for atomic state management)
* **Do This:** Explore Jotai for its approach to state management based on atomic, derived state. It is valuable when needing fine-grained control over state dependencies.
* **Don't Do This:** Attempt to port large Redux codebases to Jotai without careful consideration. Avoid creating excessively granular atoms that lead to performance bottlenecks.
**Why:** Jotai is particularly well-suited for scenarios where components need to subscribe to very specific parts of the state, minimizing re-renders and improving performance. It promotes composition and code reuse.
**Code Example:**
"""typescript
import { atom, useAtom } from 'jotai';
// Create an atom
const countAtom = atom(0);
// Example consumer
const CounterComponent = () => {
const [count, setCount] = useAtom(countAtom);
return (
Count: {count}
setCount(count + 1)}>Increment
);
};
export default CounterComponent;
"""
### 2.5. XState (for managing complex state machines)
* **Do This:** Use XState for orchestrating complex, stateful logic, like multi-step forms, workflows, or UI interactions with clearly defined states and transitions. Leverage TypeScript's type system to fully define state structures and events.
* **Don't Do This:** Overuse XState for simple UI element state. Avoid creating state machines that are excessively complex or difficult to understand.
**Why:** XState helps to manage complexity by providing a visual and declarative way to define states and transitions. TypeScript integration further enhances the development experience and ensures type safety.
**Code Example:**
"""typescript
import { createMachine, assign } from 'xstate';
import { useMachine } from '@xstate/react';
// Define the state machine context
interface ContextType {
count: number;
}
// Define the state machine events
type EventType =
| { type: 'INCREMENT' }
| { type: 'DECREMENT' };
// Create the state machine
const counterMachine = createMachine(
{
id: 'counter',
initial: 'idle',
context: {
count: 0,
},
states: {
idle: {
on: {
INCREMENT: {
actions: assign({ count: (context) => context.count + 1 }),
},
DECREMENT: {
actions: assign({ count: (context) => context.count - 1 }),
},
},
},
},
}
);
// React component using the state machine
const CounterComponent = () => {
const [state, send] = useMachine(counterMachine);
return (
Count: {state.context.count}
send('INCREMENT')}>Increment
send('DECREMENT')}>Decrement
);
};
export default CounterComponent;
"""
## 3. Reactive Programming with RxJS
### 3.1. Observables for Asynchronous Data Streams
* **Do This:** Use RxJS Observables to handle asynchronous data streams, user input, and event-driven interactions.
* **Don't Do This:** Use RxJS for simple, synchronous operations that can be handled with standard JavaScript methods. Overuse or abuse Subjects, leading to uncontrolled side effects.
**Why:** Observables provide a powerful and flexible way to manage asynchronous data over time. RxJS offers a wide range of operators for transforming, filtering, and combining streams of data.
**Code Example:**
"""typescript
import { fromEvent, interval } from 'rxjs';
import { map, filter, take, scan } from 'rxjs/operators';
// Create an observable from a DOM event
const button = document.getElementById('myButton');
if (button) {
const click$ = fromEvent(button, 'click'); // Ensure button isn't null
click$.pipe(
map(() => 1),
scan((acc, val) => acc + val, 0)
).subscribe(count => {
console.log("Button clicked ${count} times");
});
}
// Create an observable from an interval
const interval$ = interval(1000);
interval$.pipe(
filter(value => value % 2 === 0),
map(value => "Tick: ${value}"),
take(5)
).subscribe(message => {
console.log(message);
});
"""
### 3.2. Subjects for Multicasting
* **Do This:** Use RxJS Subjects to multicast values to multiple observers. Use "BehaviorSubject" or "ReplaySubject" when you need to provide an initial value or replay past values, respectively.
* **Don't Do This:** Expose Subjects directly to components. Encapsulate them within services or state management solutions to control the flow of data.
**Why:** Subjects act as both an Observable and an Observer, allowing you to push values to multiple subscribers. They are useful for creating shared data streams or event buses.
**Code Example:**
"""typescript
import { Subject } from 'rxjs';
// Create a Subject
const mySubject = new Subject();
// Subscribe to the Subject
mySubject.subscribe(value => {
console.log("Observer 1: ${value}");
});
mySubject.subscribe(value => {
console.log("Observer 2: ${value}");
});
// Push values to the Subject
mySubject.next('Hello');
mySubject.next('World');
"""
## 4. Practical Implementation Considerations
### 4.1. TypeScript Typing
* **Do This:** Use strong typing to define the shape of your state, actions, and reducers.
* **Don't Do This:** Use "any" or "unknown" types excessively, which defeats the purpose of using TypeScript.
**Why:** Strong typing improves code maintainability, prevents runtime errors, and enhances code completion in IDEs.
**Code Example:**
"""typescript
interface Product {
id: number;
name: string;
price: number;
}
type ProductAction =
| { type: "ADD_PRODUCT"; payload: Product }
| { type: "REMOVE_PRODUCT"; payload: number };
interface ProductState {
products: Product[];
}
"""
### 4.2. Performance Optimization
* **Do This:** Use memoization techniques (e.g., "useMemo", "useCallback", "React.memo") to prevent unnecessary re-renders. Select only the necessary data from the state to avoid triggering updates when unrelated data changes.
* **Don't Do This:** Neglect performance optimization, especially in large applications with frequent state updates. Deeply nested state often triggers expensive rerenders.
**Why:** Optimizing performance ensures a smooth user experience and reduces resource consumption. Memoization and selective updates can significantly improve rendering performance.
### 4.3. Testing
* **Do This:** Write unit tests for your reducers, selectors, and effects to ensure they behave as expected.
* **Don't Do This:** Neglect testing state management logic, which can lead to unexpected behavior and difficult-to-debug issues.
**Why:** Thorough testing is essential for maintaining the integrity of your state management system. Unit tests provide confidence that your code is working correctly and prevent regressions when making changes.
### 4.4. Error Handling
* **Do This:** Properly handle errors that may occur during state updates, asynchronous operations, or API calls. Display user-friendly error messages and provide mechanisms for recovering from errors.
* **Don't Do This:** Ignore errors or allow them to propagate silently, which can lead to a poor user experience and data corruption.
**Why:** Robust error handling ensures that your application can gracefully recover from unexpected errors and prevents data loss or corruption.
danielsogl
Created Mar 6, 2025
This guide explains how to effectively use .clinerules
with Cline, the AI-powered coding assistant.
The .clinerules
file is a powerful configuration file that helps Cline understand your project's requirements, coding standards, and constraints. When placed in your project's root directory, it automatically guides Cline's behavior and ensures consistency across your codebase.
Place the .clinerules
file in your project's root directory. Cline automatically detects and follows these rules for all files within the project.
# Project Overview project: name: 'Your Project Name' description: 'Brief project description' stack: - technology: 'Framework/Language' version: 'X.Y.Z' - technology: 'Database' version: 'X.Y.Z'
# Code Standards standards: style: - 'Use consistent indentation (2 spaces)' - 'Follow language-specific naming conventions' documentation: - 'Include JSDoc comments for all functions' - 'Maintain up-to-date README files' testing: - 'Write unit tests for all new features' - 'Maintain minimum 80% code coverage'
# Security Guidelines security: authentication: - 'Implement proper token validation' - 'Use environment variables for secrets' dataProtection: - 'Sanitize all user inputs' - 'Implement proper error handling'
Be Specific
Maintain Organization
Regular Updates
# Common Patterns Example patterns: components: - pattern: 'Use functional components by default' - pattern: 'Implement error boundaries for component trees' stateManagement: - pattern: 'Use React Query for server state' - pattern: 'Implement proper loading states'
Commit the Rules
.clinerules
in version controlTeam Collaboration
Rules Not Being Applied
Conflicting Rules
Performance Considerations
# Basic .clinerules Example project: name: 'Web Application' type: 'Next.js Frontend' standards: - 'Use TypeScript for all new code' - 'Follow React best practices' - 'Implement proper error handling' testing: unit: - 'Jest for unit tests' - 'React Testing Library for components' e2e: - 'Cypress for end-to-end testing' documentation: required: - 'README.md in each major directory' - 'JSDoc comments for public APIs' - 'Changelog updates for all changes'
# Advanced .clinerules Example project: name: 'Enterprise Application' compliance: - 'GDPR requirements' - 'WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility' architecture: patterns: - 'Clean Architecture principles' - 'Domain-Driven Design concepts' security: requirements: - 'OAuth 2.0 authentication' - 'Rate limiting on all APIs' - 'Input validation with Zod'
# TypeScript Performance Optimization Standards: Best Practices for Efficient Applications This document outlines coding standards and best practices specifically for performance optimization in TypeScript projects. Adhering to these guidelines will improve the speed, responsiveness, efficient use of resources, and overall user experience of your applications. ## Table of Contents - [1. Architectural Considerations for Performance](#1-architectural-considerations-for-performance) - [1.1. Code Splitting](#11-code-splitting) - [1.2. Lazy Loading Modules](#12-lazy-loading-modules) - [1.3. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) or Static Site Generation (SSG)](#13-server-side-rendering-ssr-or-static-site-generation-ssg) - [1.4. Data Structure Selection](#14-data-structure-selection) ## 1. Architectural Considerations for Performance ### 1.1. Code Splitting **Standard:** Implement code splitting to reduce the initial load time of your application. **Why:** Loading only the necessary code on initial page load significantly improves the user experience. **Do This:** * Utilize dynamic imports (`import()`) to load modules on demand. * Configure your bundler (Webpack, Parcel, Rollup) to create separate chunks for different parts of your application. **Don't Do This:** * Load the entire application code in a single bundle. * Use `require()` statements (CommonJS) in modern TypeScript projects where ES Modules are supported. **Example:** ```typescript // Before: Loading everything upfront import { featureA } from './featureA'; import { featureB } from './featureB'; // After: Code splitting with dynamic imports async function loadFeatureA() { const { featureA } = await import('./featureA'); featureA.init(); } async function loadFeatureB() { const { featureB } = await import('./featureB'); featureB.init(); } // Use loadFeatureA or loadFeatureB based on user interaction or route ``` **Bundler Configuration (Webpack example):** ```javascript // webpack.config.js module.exports = { entry: './src/index.ts', output: { filename: '[name].bundle.js', path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'), }, module: { rules: [ { test: /\.tsx?$/, use: 'ts-loader', exclude: /node_modules/, }, ], }, resolve: { extensions: ['.tsx', '.ts', '.js'], }, optimization: { splitChunks: { chunks: 'all', // Split all chunks of code }, }, }; ``` ### 1.2. Lazy Loading Modules **Standard:** Employ lazy loading for non-critical modules or components. **Why:** Reduce the amount of code that needs to be parsed and compiled on initial load. **Do This:** * Load components or modules only when they are needed. * Utilize Intersection Observer API to load components when they become visible in the viewport. **Don't Do This:** * Load modules that are not immediately required for the current user interaction. **Example (Intersection Observer Lazy Loading):** ```typescript function lazyLoadComponent(element: HTMLElement, importPath: string) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries) => { entries.forEach(async (entry) => { if (entry.isIntersecting) { const { default: Component } = await import(importPath); const componentInstance = new Component(); // Instantiate the component. element.appendChild(componentInstance.render()); // Append to the DOM (adjust according to your framework). observer.unobserve(element); } }); }); observer.observe(element); } // Usage: const lazyComponentElement = document.getElementById('lazy-component'); if (lazyComponentElement) { lazyLoadComponent(lazyComponentElement, './MyHeavyComponent'); } ``` ### 1.3. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) or Static Site Generation (SSG) **Standard:** Consider using SSR or SSG for content-heavy, SEO-sensitive, or performance-critical applications. **Why:** Reduces the time to first paint (TTFP) and improves SEO by providing crawlers with pre-rendered content. **Do This:** * Evaluate the trade-offs between SSR, SSG, and client-side rendering (CSR) based on your application's needs. * Use frameworks like Next.js (React), Nuxt.js (Vue), or Angular Universal. * Implement appropriate caching strategies for SSR. **Don't Do This:** * Default to CSR when SSR or SSG could provide significant performance benefits. **Example (Next.js):** ```typescript // pages/index.tsx (Next.js example) import React from 'react'; interface Props { data: { title: string; description: string; }; } const HomePage: React.FC<Props> = ({ data }) => { return ( <div> <h1>{data.title}</h1> <p>{data.description}</p> </div> ); }; export async function getServerSideProps() { // Fetch data from an API, database, or file system. const data = { title: 'My Awesome Website', description: 'Welcome to my extremely performant website!', }; return { props: { data, }, }; } export default HomePage; ``` ### 1.4. Data Structure Selection **Standard:** Select the most appropriate data structure for each specific use case. **Why:** Using appropriate data structures will reduce the complexity and improve the execution speed of algorithms. **Do This:** * Use `Map` when you need to associate keys with values, especially when the keys are not strings or numbers. * Use `Set` when you need to store a collection of unique values. * Use `Record<K, V>` type for type-safe object mapping. * Consider specialized data structures for specific performance needs (e.g., priority queues, linked lists). **Don't Do This:** * Use generic arrays or objects when more specialized data structures would be more efficient. * Perform frequent lookups in arrays when using a Map or Set would be more performant. **Example:** ```typescript // Before: Using an array for lookups const users = [ { id: 1, name: 'Alice' }, { id: 2, name: 'Bob' }, { id: 3, name: 'Charlie' } ]; // O(n) lookup operation const findUser = (id: number) => users.find(user => user.id === id); // After: Using Map for efficient lookups const userMap = new Map<number, {id: number, name: string}>(); userMap.set(1, { id: 1, name: 'Alice' }); userMap.set(2, { id: 2, name: 'Bob' }); userMap.set(3, { id: 3, name: 'Charlie' }); // O(1) lookup operation const getUser = (id: number) => userMap.get(id); ```
Debe preferir usar el gestor de versiones "pnpm" por sobre "npm" para la ejecución de los comandos.
# Storybook Guidelines for Angular (v9.0.18+) Use these guidelines when working with Storybook in Angular projects. This document covers modern patterns, best practices, and the latest features in Storybook 9.x. ## 1. Core Architecture & Setup ### Framework Configuration - **Angular Framework**: Always use `@storybook/angular` as the framework in your `.storybook/main.ts` - **TypeScript First**: All configuration files should use TypeScript (`.ts` extension) - **Standalone Components**: Leverage Angular standalone components in stories - they work seamlessly with Storybook - **Modern Angular Patterns**: Support for Angular 17+ features including signals, control flow, and standalone APIs ### Basic Configuration Structure ```typescript // .storybook/main.ts import type { StorybookConfig } from '@storybook/angular'; const config: StorybookConfig = { framework: { name: '@storybook/angular', options: { // Framework-specific options }, }, stories: ['../src/**/*.stories.@(js|jsx|mjs|ts|tsx)'], addons: [ '@storybook/addon-essentials', '@storybook/addon-interactions', '@storybook/addon-a11y', '@storybook/addon-docs', '@storybook/addon-vitest', // For Storybook 9.x testing ], }; export default config; ``` ## 2. Story Structure & CSF 3 Patterns ### Modern Story Format (CSF 3) - **Component Story Format 3**: Use the latest CSF 3 syntax for all new stories - **TypeScript Types**: Always use `Meta` and `StoryObj` for type safety - **Minimal Boilerplate**: Leverage CSF 3's simplified syntax ```typescript import type { Meta, StoryObj } from '@storybook/angular'; import { Button } from './button.component'; const meta: Meta = { component: Button, }; export default meta; type Story = StoryObj; export const Primary: Story = { args: { primary: true, label: 'Button', }, }; export const Secondary: Story = { args: { primary: false, label: 'Button', }, }; ``` ### Story Naming & Organization - **Descriptive Names**: Use clear, descriptive names for story exports - **Hierarchical Titles**: Organize stories with meaningful hierarchies using forward slashes - **Auto-Generated Titles**: Leverage automatic title generation when possible - **Component-Centric**: Group stories by component, not by state ```typescript const meta: Meta = { title: 'Design System/Components/Button', // Hierarchical organization component: Button, }; ``` ## 3. Angular-Specific Patterns ### Standalone Components (Recommended) - **Default Approach**: Prefer standalone components for new development - **No Module Imports**: Avoid importing CommonModule or other NgModules - **Direct Dependencies**: Import only required standalone components, directives, or pipes ```typescript // ✅ Good - Standalone component story import type { Meta, StoryObj } from '@storybook/angular'; import { MyStandaloneComponent } from './my-standalone.component'; const meta: Meta = { component: MyStandaloneComponent, }; ``` ### Legacy Module-Based Components - **Module Metadata**: Use `moduleMetadata` decorator for components requiring NgModules - **Minimal Imports**: Import only necessary modules and declarations ```typescript // For legacy components requiring modules import { moduleMetadata } from '@storybook/angular'; import { CommonModule } from '@angular/common'; const meta: Meta = { component: LegacyComponent, decorators: [ moduleMetadata({ imports: [CommonModule], declarations: [LegacyComponent, ChildComponent], }), ], }; ``` ### Application Configuration - **Provider Setup**: Use `applicationConfig` decorator for dependency injection - **Service Mocking**: Configure providers for testing scenarios ```typescript import { applicationConfig } from '@storybook/angular'; import { importProvidersFrom } from '@angular/core'; import { BrowserAnimationsModule } from '@angular/platform-browser/animations'; const meta: Meta = { component: MyComponent, decorators: [ applicationConfig({ providers: [ importProvidersFrom(BrowserAnimationsModule), // Add other providers as needed ], }), ], }; ``` ## 4. Story Configuration & Best Practices ### Args and Controls - **Typed Args**: Leverage TypeScript for type-safe arguments - **Meaningful Defaults**: Provide sensible default values - **Control Types**: Explicitly define control types when needed ```typescript const meta: Meta = { component: Button, argTypes: { size: { control: { type: 'select' }, options: ['small', 'medium', 'large'], }, disabled: { control: { type: 'boolean' }, }, }, args: { // Default args for all stories size: 'medium', disabled: false, label: 'Button', }, }; ``` ### Parameters Configuration - **Global Parameters**: Set common parameters at the meta level - **Story-Specific Overrides**: Override parameters for specific stories when needed - **Documentation**: Use parameters for docs configuration ```typescript const meta: Meta = { component: Button, parameters: { docs: { description: { component: 'A versatile button component for user interactions.', }, }, backgrounds: { default: 'light', }, }, }; export const OnDark: Story = { parameters: { backgrounds: { default: 'dark' }, }, }; ``` ## 5. Advanced Patterns ### Custom Render Functions - **Complex Templates**: Use render functions for complex component templates - **Template Customization**: Provide custom templates when component alone isn't sufficient ```typescript export const WithCustomTemplate: Story = { render: args => ({ props: args, template: ` <p>Additional content around the button</p> `, }), }; ``` ### Component Composition - **Multi-Component Stories**: Show components working together - **Real-World Scenarios**: Create stories that demonstrate actual usage patterns ```typescript const meta: Meta = { component: List, decorators: [ moduleMetadata({ declarations: [List, ListItem], }), ], }; export const WithItems: Story = { render: args => ({ props: args, template: ` Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 `, }), }; ``` ## 6. Testing Integration (Storybook 9.x) ### Vitest Addon Integration - **Modern Testing**: Use `@storybook/addon-vitest` for component testing - **Story-Based Tests**: Transform stories into tests automatically - **Browser Mode**: Leverage Vitest's browser mode for realistic testing ```bash # Install and configure Vitest addon npx storybook@latest add @storybook/addon-vitest ``` ### Interaction Testing - **Play Functions**: Use play functions for interaction testing - **User Events**: Simulate real user interactions - **Assertions**: Include meaningful assertions in play functions ```typescript import { userEvent, within, expect } from '@storybook/test'; export const InteractiveTest: Story = { args: { label: 'Click me', }, play: async ({ canvasElement }) => { const canvas = within(canvasElement); const button = canvas.getByRole('button'); await userEvent.click(button); await expect(button).toHaveClass('clicked'); }, }; ``` ### Accessibility Testing - **A11y Addon**: Include `@storybook/addon-a11y` for accessibility checks - **ARIA Labels**: Ensure proper ARIA labeling in stories - **Keyboard Navigation**: Test keyboard accessibility ```typescript const meta: Meta = { component: Button, parameters: { a11y: { config: { rules: [ { id: 'color-contrast', enabled: true, }, ], }, }, }, }; ``` ## 7. Documentation & Docs Integration ### Compodoc Integration - **API Documentation**: Integrate Compodoc for automatic API docs generation - **Angular.json Configuration**: Configure builders for Compodoc integration ```json // angular.json { "projects": { "your-project": { "architect": { "storybook": { "builder": "@storybook/angular:start-storybook", "options": { "compodoc": true, "compodocArgs": ["-e", "json", "-d", "."] } } } } } } ``` ```typescript // .storybook/preview.ts import { setCompodocJson } from '@storybook/addon-docs/angular'; import docJson from '../documentation.json'; setCompodocJson(docJson); ``` ### Story Documentation - **JSDoc Comments**: Use JSDoc comments for automatic documentation - **Description Parameters**: Override descriptions when needed - **Code Examples**: Include relevant code examples ```typescript /** * Primary button component for user actions. * Supports various sizes and states. */ const meta: Meta = { component: Button, parameters: { docs: { description: { component: 'The primary button component with full accessibility support.', }, }, }, }; /** * The primary button state - used for main actions */ export const Primary: Story = { parameters: { docs: { description: { story: 'Use this variant for primary actions like "Save" or "Submit".', }, }, }, }; ``` ## 8. Performance & Optimization ### Lazy Loading - **Code Splitting**: Leverage Angular's lazy loading for large component libraries - **Story Optimization**: Keep stories focused and lightweight - **Asset Management**: Optimize images and other assets ### Bundle Optimization - **Tree Shaking**: Ensure proper tree shaking of unused code - **Minimal Dependencies**: Import only necessary dependencies - **Build Configuration**: Optimize build configuration for production ## 9. Theming & Styling ### Angular Material Integration - **Theme Providers**: Use decorators to provide Angular Material themes - **Component Wrapper**: Wrap stories with theme providers when needed ```typescript import { componentWrapperDecorator } from '@storybook/angular'; const meta: Meta = { component: MyComponent, decorators: [componentWrapperDecorator(story => `${story}`)], }; ``` ### CSS Custom Properties - **Design Tokens**: Use CSS custom properties for consistent theming - **Theme Switching**: Implement theme switching in stories - **Responsive Design**: Test components across different viewports ## 10. File Organization & Naming ### File Structure - **Co-location**: Keep stories close to their components - **Consistent Naming**: Use consistent naming patterns - **Logical Grouping**: Group related stories together ``` src/ components/ button/ button.component.ts button.component.html button.component.scss button.component.stories.ts button.component.spec.ts ``` ### Naming Conventions - **Story Files**: Use `.stories.ts` extension - **Export Names**: Use PascalCase for story exports - **File Names**: Use kebab-case for file names ## 11. CI/CD Integration ### Build Configuration - **Static Builds**: Configure static build for deployment - **Environment Variables**: Handle environment-specific configuration - **Testing Pipeline**: Integrate story testing in CI/CD ```bash # Build Storybook for production ng run your-project:build-storybook # Run tests with Vitest addon npm run test-storybook ``` ### Deployment - **Static Hosting**: Deploy to static hosting services - **Version Management**: Tag releases with version numbers - **Documentation Updates**: Keep documentation in sync with code ## 12. Migration & Maintenance ### Upgrading Storybook - **Regular Updates**: Keep Storybook updated to latest versions - **Migration Guides**: Follow official migration guides - **Breaking Changes**: Test thoroughly after major updates ### Legacy Code Migration - **Gradual Migration**: Migrate stories incrementally - **CSF 2 to CSF 3**: Upgrade older story formats - **Module to Standalone**: Migrate to standalone components when possible ## 13. Common Patterns & Examples ### Form Components ```typescript export const FormExample: Story = { render: args => ({ props: args, template: ` `, }), }; ``` ### Data Loading States ```typescript export const Loading: Story = { args: { loading: true, data: null, }, }; export const WithData: Story = { args: { loading: false, data: mockData, }, }; export const Error: Story = { args: { loading: false, error: 'Failed to load data', }, }; ``` ### Responsive Components ```typescript export const Mobile: Story = { parameters: { viewport: { defaultViewport: 'mobile1', }, }, }; export const Desktop: Story = { parameters: { viewport: { defaultViewport: 'desktop', }, }, }; ``` ## 14. Quality Guidelines ### Code Quality - **TypeScript Strict Mode**: Use strict TypeScript configuration - **ESLint Rules**: Follow Storybook-specific ESLint rules - **Consistent Formatting**: Use Prettier for code formatting ### Testing Standards - **Coverage Goals**: Aim for high story coverage of component states - **Interaction Tests**: Include interaction tests for complex components - **Accessibility Tests**: Ensure all stories pass accessibility checks ### Documentation Standards - **Complete Coverage**: Document all component props and behaviors - **Real Examples**: Provide realistic usage examples - **Up-to-date**: Keep documentation synchronized with code changes ## 15. Troubleshooting & Common Issues ### Angular-Specific Issues - **Module Dependencies**: Ensure all required modules are imported - **Provider Configuration**: Check provider setup for dependency injection - **Change Detection**: Consider OnPush change detection strategy ### Performance Issues - **Bundle Size**: Monitor and optimize bundle size - **Memory Leaks**: Watch for memory leaks in complex stories - **Build Time**: Optimize build configuration for faster development This comprehensive guide ensures you're following the latest best practices for Storybook 9.x with Angular, leveraging modern features like the Vitest addon, improved testing capabilities, and optimized development workflows.
--- alwaysApply: true description: Avoid 'else'; prefer guard clauses and polymorphism to keep a linear flow --- ## Do not use the `else` keyword Avoid `else` to reduce branching and nesting. This keeps a linear top-to-bottom reading flow and simplifies methods. ### Preferred alternatives - **Guard clauses (early return/exit)**: handle exceptional cases up front and return immediately. - **Polymorphism**: for complex conditional logic based on type/state, use Strategy/State instead of chained conditionals. ### Example (guard clause) ❌ Bad: ```ts function processPayment(payment: Payment): boolean { if (payment.isVerified()) { console.log("Processing payment..."); return true; } else { console.log("Payment not verified."); return false; } } ``` ✅ Good: ```ts function processPayment(payment: Payment): boolean { // Guard clause if (!payment.isVerified()) { console.log("Payment not verified."); return false; } // Happy path console.log("Processing payment..."); return true; } ```
# Code Style and Conventions Standards for TypeScript This document outlines coding style and conventions standards for TypeScript development. Adhering to these standards promotes code consistency, readability, maintainability, and collaboration within development teams. These guidelines are tailored for the latest version of TypeScript and aim to leverage modern best practices. ## 1. Formatting Consistent formatting is crucial for readability. We adopt the following standards for TypeScript code formatting: ### 1.1. Whitespace and Indentation * **Standard:** Use 2 spaces for indentation. Avoid tabs. * **Why:** Consistent indentation enhances readability and reduces visual clutter. * **Do This:** """typescript function calculateArea(width: number, height: number): number { const area = width * height; return area; } """ * **Don't Do This:** """typescript function calculateArea(width: number, height: number): number { const area = width * height; return area; } """ * **Standard:** Use blank lines to separate logical sections of code within functions and classes. * **Why:** Separating logical blocks improves code comprehension. * **Do This:** """typescript function processData(data: any[]): void { // Validate data if (!data || data.length === 0) { throw new Error("Data is invalid."); } // Transform data const transformedData = data.map(item => ({ ...item, processed: true, })); // Save data saveToDatabase(transformedData); } """ ### 1.2. Line Length * **Standard:** Limit lines to a maximum of 120 characters. * **Why:** Enforces readability on various screen sizes and IDE configurations. * **How:** Configure your editor or IDE to display a line length guide at 120 characters. Break long lines at logical points, such as after commas, operators, or before opening parentheses. * **Do This:** """typescript const veryLongVariableName = calculateSomethingComplicated( param1, param2, param3 ); """ * **Don't Do This:** """typescript const veryLongVariableName = calculateSomethingComplicated(param1, param2, param3); """ ### 1.3. Braces and Parentheses * **Standard:** Use braces for all control flow statements, even single-line statements. * **Why:** Improves code clarity and reduces potential errors when modifying code. * **Do This:** """typescript if (isValid) { console.log("Valid"); } else { console.log("Invalid"); } """ * **Don't Do This:** """typescript if (isValid) console.log("Valid"); else console.log("Invalid"); """ * **Standard:** Use parentheses to clarify operator precedence, where needed. * **Why:** Reduces ambiguity, especially in complex expressions. * **Example:** """typescript const result = (a + b) * c; """ ### 1.4. Semicolons * **Standard:** Always use semicolons to terminate statements. * **Why:** Prevents unexpected behavior due to JavaScript's automatic semicolon insertion (ASI). * **Do This:** """typescript const name = "John"; console.log(name); """ * **Don't Do This:** """typescript const name = "John" console.log(name) """ ## 2. Naming Conventions Consistent naming conventions are essential for code clarity and maintainability. ### 2.1. Variables and Constants * **Standard:** Use camelCase for variable and constant names. * **Why:** Widely adopted convention for JavaScript and TypeScript. * **Do This:** """typescript const userName = "Alice"; let itemCount = 0; """ * **Standard:** Use UPPER_SNAKE_CASE for constant values (i.e. values that may be inlined for performance or are known at compile time). * **Why:** Clearly distinguishes constants from variables. * **Do This:** """typescript const MAX_RETRIES = 3; const API_ENDPOINT = "https://example.com/api"; """ ### 2.2. Functions and Methods * **Standard:** Use camelCase for function and method names. * **Why:** Follows common JavaScript/TypeScript conventions. * **Do This:** """typescript function calculateTotal(price: number, quantity: number): number { return price * quantity; } class ShoppingCart { addItem(item: string): void { console.log("Adding ${item} to the cart."); } } """ ### 2.3. Classes and Interfaces * **Standard:** Use PascalCase for class and interface names. * **Why:** Clearly identifies classes and interfaces. * **Do This:** """typescript interface User { id: number; name: string; } class Product { constructor(public name: string, public price: number) {} } """ ### 2.4. Type Parameters * **Standard:** Use single uppercase letters, typically "T", "U", "V", etc., for generic type parameters. * **Why:** Follows established TypeScript conventions. * **Do This:** """typescript function identity<T>(arg: T): T { return arg; } """ ### 2.5. Boolean Variables * **Standard:** Prefix boolean variables with "is", "has", or "should" to indicate a boolean value. * **Why:** Improves readability by clearly indicating the purpose of the variable. * **Do This:** """typescript let isValid: boolean = true; let hasPermission: boolean = false; let shouldUpdate: boolean = true; """ ## 3. Stylistic Consistency Consistency in style is critical for code maintainability. ### 3.1. Type Annotations and Inference * **Standard:** Use explicit type annotations where type inference is not obvious, especially for function parameters and return types. * **Why:** Improves code clarity and helps catch type-related errors early. * **Do This:** """typescript function greet(name: string): string { return "Hello, ${name}!"; } const add: (x: number, y: number) => number = (x, y) => x + y; """ * **Don't Do This:** """typescript function greet(name) { // Implicit 'any' type return "Hello, ${name}!"; } """ * **Standard:** Leverage type inference for local variables when the type is immediately apparent. * **Why:** Reduces verbosity and keeps code concise. * **Do This:** """typescript const message = "Hello, world!"; // Type inferred as string const count = 10; // Type inferred as number """ * **Standard:** When initializing variables with "null" or "undefined", explicitly define the type. * **Why:** Helps avoid unexpected type-related issues later. * **Do This:** """typescript let user: User | null = null; let data: string[] | undefined = undefined; """ ### 3.2. String Usage * **Standard:** Prefer template literals for string concatenation and multi-line strings. * **Why:** More readable and easier to maintain compared to traditional string concatenation. * **Do This:** """typescript const name = "Alice"; const message = "Hello, ${name}!"; const multiLine = "This is a multi-line string."; """ * **Don't Do This:** """typescript const name = "Alice"; const message = "Hello, " + name + "!"; const multiLine = "This is a\n" + "multi-line string."; """ ### 3.3. Object Literals * **Standard:** Use shorthand notation for object properties when the property name matches the variable name. * **Why:** Improves code conciseness and readability. * **Do This:** """typescript const name = "Alice"; const age = 30; const user = { name, age }; // Shorthand notation """ * **Don't Do This:** """typescript const name = "Alice"; const age = 30; const user = { name: name, age: age }; """ * **Standard:** Use object spread syntax for creating copies of objects or merging objects. * **Why:** More concise and readable than older methods like "Object.assign()". * **Do This:** """typescript const original = { a: 1, b: 2 }; const copy = { ...original, c: 3 }; // Creates a new object with a, b, and c """ ### 3.4. Arrow Functions * **Standard:** Use arrow functions for concise function expressions, especially for callbacks and inline functions. * **Why:** More compact syntax and lexically binds "this". * **Do This:** """typescript const numbers = [1, 2, 3]; const squared = numbers.map(x => x * x); // Concise arrow function """ * **Don't Do This:** """typescript const numbers = [1, 2, 3]; const squared = numbers.map(function(x) { return x * x; }); """ * **Standard:** Omit parentheses for single-parameter arrow functions. * **Why:** Makes the code even more concise. * **Do This:** """typescript const increment = x => x + 1; """ * **Don't Do This:** """typescript const increment = (x) => x + 1; """ ### 3.5. Modern TypeScript Features * **Standard:** Leverage features like optional chaining ("?.") and nullish coalescing ("??") for safer and more concise code. Optional properties on interfaces may be relevant if these are in use. * **Why:** Reduces boilerplate and improves null/undefined handling. * **Do This:** """typescript interface User { profile?: { address?: { city?: string; } } } const user: User = {}; const city = user?.profile?.address?.city ?? "Unknown"; // Nullish coalescing console.log(city); interface Config { timeout?: number; } const defaultConfig: Config = { timeout: 5000, }; function initialize(config?: Config) { const timeout = config?.timeout ?? defaultConfig.timeout; console.log("Timeout: ${timeout}"); } initialize(); // Timeout: 5000 initialize({ timeout: 10000 }); // Timeout: 10000 """ * **Standard:** Utilize discriminated unions and exhaustive checks for increased type safety and maintainability. * **Why:** Improves type correctness and makes it easier to handle different states or object types. * **Do This:** """typescript interface Success { type: "success"; result: any; } interface Error { type: "error"; message: string; } type Result = Success | Error; function handleResult(result: Result) { switch (result.type) { case "success": console.log("Success:", result.result); break; case "error": console.error("Error:", result.message); break; default: // Exhaustive check: TypeScript will flag this if a new type is added to Result const _exhaustiveCheck: never = result; return _exhaustiveCheck; } } const successResult: Success = { type: "success", result: { data: "example" } }; const errorResult: Error = { type: "error", message: "Something went wrong" }; handleResult(successResult); handleResult(errorResult); """ ### 3.6. Asynchronous Code * **Standard:** Always use "async/await" syntax for asynchronous operations. * **Why:** Improves readability and simplifies error handling compared to traditional promise chains. * **Do This:** """typescript async function fetchData(): Promise<any> { try { const response = await fetch("https://example.com/api/data"); const data = await response.json(); return data; } catch (error) { console.error("Error fetching data:", error); throw error; } } """ * **Don't Do This:** """typescript function fetchData(): Promise<any> { return fetch("https://example.com/api/data") .then(response => response.json()) .then(data => data) .catch(error => { console.error("Error fetching data:", error); throw error; }); } """ * **Standard:** Use "Promise.all" for concurrent asynchronous operations that don't depend on each other. * **Why:** Improves performance by executing asynchronous tasks in parallel. * **Do This:** """typescript async function processData(): Promise<void> { const [result1, result2] = await Promise.all([ fetchData1(), fetchData2(), ]); console.log("Result 1:", result1); console.log("Result 2:", result2); } """ ### 3.7 Error Handling * **Standard:** Implement robust error handling using "try...catch" blocks, especially in asynchronous functions. * **Why:** Prevents unhandled exceptions and allows for graceful recovery. * **Do This:** """typescript async function doSomething() { try { const result = await someAsyncOperation(); console.log("Result:", result); } catch (error) { console.error("An error occurred:", error); // Implement specific error handling/logging } } """ * **Standard:** Create custom error classes to provide more context and specify error handling logic. * **Why:** Extends the built-in Error to communicate more specific information about the error to the outside world. * **Do This:** """typescript class CustomError extends Error { constructor(message: string, public errorCode: number) { super(message); this.name = "CustomError"; Object.setPrototypeOf(this, CustomError.prototype); } } async function performOperation() { try { // some operation throw new CustomError("Operation failed", 500); } catch (error) { if (error instanceof CustomError) { console.error("Custom Error ${error.errorCode}: ${error.message}"); } else { console.error("An unexpected error occurred:", error); } } } """ ### 3.8 Immutability * **Standard:** Strive for immutability whenever practical, using "const" for variables that should not be reassigned and avoiding direct modification of objects and arrays. * **Why:** Makes code more predictable and easier to reason about, reducing the risk of bugs. * **Do This:** """typescript const originalArray = [1, 2, 3]; const newArray = [...originalArray, 4]; // Creates a new array const originalObject = { a: 1, b: 2 }; const newObject = { ...originalObject, c: 3 }; // Creates a new object """ * **Don't Do This:** """typescript const originalArray = [1, 2, 3]; originalArray.push(4); // Modifies the original array const originalObject = { a: 1, b: 2 }; originalObject.c = 3; // Modifies the original object """ ### 3.9 Comments * **Standard:** Add comments to explain complex or non-obvious logic, but prioritize writing self-documenting code. * **Why:** Comments should supplement, not replace, clear code. * **Guidelines:** * Use JSDoc-style comments for documenting functions, classes, and interfaces. * Explain the *why*, not the *what*. The code should explain what it does. * Keep comments concise and up-to-date. * Remove outdated or redundant comments. * **Example:** """typescript /** * Calculates the area of a rectangle. * @param width The width of the rectangle. * @param height The height of the rectangle. * @returns The area of the rectangle. */ function calculateArea(width: number, height: number): number { return width * height; } """ ## 4. Technology Specific Details (Distinguishing Good from Great) * **Standard:** Take advantage of TypeScript's advanced type features to create robust and maintainable code structures. * **Guidelines:** * **Utility Types:** Employ TypeScript's utility types ("Partial", "Readonly", "Pick", "Omit", "Record", etc.) to manipulate types and generate new types efficiently. """typescript interface User { id: number; name: string; email: string; age: number; } // Make all properties optional type PartialUser = Partial<User>; // Make specified properties required type RequiredIdAndName = Required<Pick<User, 'id' | 'name'>>; // Type with only certain properties type UserInfo = Pick<User, 'name' | 'email'>; // Type without certain properties type UserWithoutId = Omit<User, 'id'>; """ * **Mapped Types:** Utilize mapped types to transform the properties of an existing type, providing a dynamic way to define new types based on existing ones. """typescript interface Product { id: string; name: string; price: number; } // Create a read-only version of Product type ReadonlyProduct = Readonly<Product>; // Create a type where all properties of Product are nullable type NullableProduct = { [K in keyof Product]: Product[K] | null; }; """ * **Conditional Types:** Conditional types allow to define types based on conditions, adding yet another powerful layer of abstraction to type definitions. They help to ensure type safety throughout an application. """typescript type NonNullableProperty<T, K extends keyof T> = T[K] extends null | undefined ? never : K; type RequiredProperties<T> = Pick<T, NonNullableProperty<T, keyof T>>; interface Configuration { host?: string; port?: number; // Port can be potentially undefined or null timeout?: number; } // Extracts properties that are guaranteed to be assigned during runtime. type RuntimeProperties = RequiredProperties<Configuration>; // Result equivalent to {timeout: number;} """ * **Decorators:** Use decorators to add metadata or modify the behavior of classes, methods, properties, or parameters. * **Why:** Provide a declarative and reusable way to add functionality, such as logging, validation, or dependency injection. * **Example:** """typescript function logMethod(target: any, propertyKey: string, descriptor: PropertyDescriptor) { const originalMethod = descriptor.value; descriptor.value = function(...args: any[]) { console.log("Calling method ${propertyKey} with arguments: ${JSON.stringify(args)}"); const result = originalMethod.apply(this, args); console.log("Method ${propertyKey} returned: ${result}"); return result; }; return descriptor; } class Calculator { @logMethod add(a: number, b: number): number { return a + b; } } const calculator = new Calculator(); calculator.add(2, 3); // Output: // Calling method add with arguments: [2,3] // Method add returned: 5 """ ## 5. Tooling * **Standard:** Use Prettier for automatic code formatting and ESLint with recommended TypeScript rules for linting. * **Why:** Automates formatting and enforces code quality, reducing manual effort and improving consistency. * **Configuration:** Configure Prettier and ESLint to work seamlessly with your IDE and CI/CD pipeline. * **Example ".eslintrc.js" configuration:** """javascript module.exports = { parser: "@typescript-eslint/parser", parserOptions: { ecmaVersion: 2020, sourceType: "module", project: './tsconfig.json', }, plugins: ["@typescript-eslint"], extends: [ "eslint:recommended", "plugin:@typescript-eslint/recommended", "plugin:@typescript-eslint/recommended-requiring-type-checking", "prettier", ], rules: { // Add or override rules here }, }; """ By adhering to these coding standards, TypeScript projects will benefit from improved code quality, readability, and maintainability, fostering a collaborative and productive development environment.